Will creation be “banned” from Europe?
Published June 27th, 2007 in Current Issues in the World, Press CoverageThe following excerpt is from an article I would encourage you all to read:
“…next Tuesday, the Council of Europe (CoE), Europe’s main human-rights body, will vote on a proposal which advocates the fight against creationism, ‘young earth’ and ‘intelligent design’ in its 47 member states.
“According to a report of the CoE’s Parliamentary Assembly, creationists are dangerous ‘religious fundamentalists’ who propagate ‘forms of religious extremism’ and ‘could become a threat to human rights.’ The report adds that the acceptance of the science of evolutionism ‘is crucial to the future of our societies and our democracies.’
“‘Creationism, born of the denial of the evolution of species through natural selection, was for a long time an almost exclusively American phenomenon,’ the report says.
“‘Today creationist theories are tending to find their way into Europe and their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member states. […] [T]his is liable to encourage the development of all manner of fundamentalism and extremism, synonymous with attacks of utmost virulence on human rights. The total rejection of science is definitely one of the most serious threats to human rights and civic rights. […] The war on the theory of evolution and on its proponents most often originates in forms of religious extremism which are closely allied to extreme right-wing political movements. The creationist movements possess real political power. The fact of the matter, and this has been exposed on several occasions, is that the advocates of strict creationism are out to replace democracy by theocracy. [...] If we are not careful, the values that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be under direct threat from creationist fundamentalists.’
According to the CoE report, America and Australia are already on their way towards becoming such undemocratic theocracies where human and civic rights are endangered. Creationism is ‘well-developed in the English-speaking countries, especially the United States and Australia,’ the report states.
“‘While most curricula in Europe today unashamedly teach evolution as a recognised scientific theory, the same does not apply to the United States.’”
Read the entire article at:
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2211
Article “misses the boat”
An article in the Sacramento Bee newspaper on Noah’s Ark, with reference to the movie Evan Almighty and the Creation Museum shows the extreme ignorance of people concerning the account of the Flood and Noah’s Ark in Genesis.
For instance, the reporter states: “Some scientists have spent years searching for the ark’s existence. Others have tried to determine its exact proportions.” Determine its exact proportions? How about reading Genesis 6 where Noah is told the EXACT proportions (how many cubits wide, high, and long)?
The article goes on to state:
“The ark at the Creation Museum shows how the ark came about. Many Christians believe the events happened as described in the Bible. Looy says there was a global flood and that the ark was about 450 feet long and held 10,000 animals, including dinosaurs.“Many of the 26,000 people who’ve visited the museum in the first three weeks spent a lot of time at the Noah exhibit.
“‘The ark is big, so it gives people a perspective of how large the real one was,’ says Looy. He knows that many, especially in the science community, disagree with such a literal interpretation of the Noah story. But that doesn’t seem to bother him. ‘I sympathize with them. I used to believe in evolution until I looked at both sides and used my critical thinking skills.’ Others say using Genesis as a history textbook is wrong. ‘They’ve missed the boat, so to speak,’ says Pleins, ‘They’re missing the mythological interpretations and perhaps the point of the story.’ Hirschfield believes that‘focusing on such a narrow interpretation of the Bible limits people’s ability to access the truths of the Bible.’”
What would happen if people called the bodily resurrection of Christ a “narrow interpretation” and one needed to accept that the event could mean anything?
Well, you can get some antacids and read the rest of this article at:
http://www.sacbee.com/107/story/236455.html
Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying.
Ken
Tags: bible, creation, creation museum, creation science, evolution, genesis, jesus, media coverage, news, prayer, scienceSearch
About this Blog
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Categories
- Around AiG (668)
- Current Issues in the World (208)
- Feedback (288)
- Guest Blog (59)
- Ministry Updates (231)
- Museum Updates (251)
- My Journeys (594)
- Podcasts (719)
- Press Coverage (216)
- Thoughts and Things (193)
